Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Original Research (Preprint)

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Regular Issue

Heart Rate Variability Normative Values in Mongolian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Submitted
December 23, 2025
Published
December 31, 2025

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects autonomic nervous system function, yet normative data for Mongolian adults are limited. This study establishes short-term HRV normative values, stratified by gender and age.

From July 2020 to August 2023, this cross-sectional study enrolled 1,144 adults (413 men, 731 women; aged 18–68 years) from Ulaanbaatar and four Mongolian regions. Participants underwent physical examinations, completed validated Mongolian-language patient-reported outcome measures (HADS, PSQI, WHOQOL-BREF, MMSE, and BOS), and 5-minute HRV recordings while seated. Time-domain (SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50) and frequency-domain (LF, HF, LF/HF) metrics were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p < 0.05).

Participants had a mean age of 37.9 ± 11.1 years (63.9% women). Women exhibited higher median heart rate (80 ± 10 bpm vs. 74 ± 12 bpm, p < 0.01) and HF power (42.9 ± 18.1 nu vs. 39.6 ± 17.6 nu, p = 0.150). SDNN (37.2 ± 18.4 ms) and RMSSD (29.0 ± 16.7 ms) declined with age (p < 0.001). Parasympathetic metrics (pNN50, HF) were higher in women and younger groups. Age and gender significantly shape HRV in Mongolian adults, with time-domain metrics decreasing with age. These normative values support epidemiological and clinical research.

References

  1. Bat-Erdene E, et al. Quality of life in the general population of Mongolia: Normative data on WHOQOL-BREF. PLOS One. 2023; 18(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291427
  2. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
  3. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  4. Koenig J, Thayer JF. Gender differences in healthy human heart rate variability: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;64:288–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007
  5. Lkhagvasuren B, et al. The Brain Overwork Scale: a population-based cross-sectional study on the psychometric properties of a new 10-item scale to assess mental distress in Mongolia. Healthcare. 2023;11:1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071003
  6. Natarajan A, Pantelopoulos A, Emir-Farinas H, Natarajan P. Heart rate variability with photoplethysmography in 8 million individuals: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(12):e650–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30246-6
  7. Nunan D, Sandercock GR, Brodie DA. A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short-term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(11):1407–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02841.x
  8. Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258
  9. Shaffer, F., Meehan, Z. M., & Zerr, C. L. (2020). A critical review of ultra-short-term heart rate variability norms research. *Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14*, 594880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.594880
  10. Tabata M, et al. Cosinor analysis of heart rate variability in ambulatory migraineurs. Headache. 2000;40(6):457-463. https://doi:10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00068.x
  11. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation. 1996;93(5):1043–65. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043
  12. Thayer JF, Lane RD. Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(2):81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004
  13. Tumurbaatar E, et al. Translation, reliability, and structural validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in the general population of Mongolia. Neuroscience Research Notes. 2021;4(3):30–39. https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v4i3Suppl.101
  14. Tumurbaatar E, et al. Psychometric properties of the Mongolian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Neurosci Res Notes. 2023;6(3): 190.1–190.8,. https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i3.190
  15. World Health Organization. WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment. Geneva: WHO; 1996. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHOQOL-BREF
  16. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x